One program, five lenses.
I work across ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, BSI C5, and NIS2. The interesting work is finding the common control underneath different requirements, then making ownership and evidence repeatable.
I build security programs people can actually understand and use.
I was born in New York, grew up in the States, and my parents are from Ghana. I now work in information security and privacy in Germany. I like the part of the job where a complicated requirement meets a very ordinary question: “So what do we do?”
Where did that number come from? Who will own this control next month? What changes if the first account of an incident turns out to be incomplete?
Those questions are how I work. I’m interested in the point where security stops being a document and starts shaping a real decision.
At Link11, I’ve helped extend a program centered on ISO 27001 into work across SOC 2, PCI DSS, BSI C5, and NIS2. That also means privacy questions, customer assurance, incidents, and translating between people who see the same problem from different sides.
I care about how the answer is communicated. A good control can still fail if nobody understands why it exists or what to do when it breaks.
I work across ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, BSI C5, and NIS2. The interesting work is finding the common control underneath different requirements, then making ownership and evidence repeatable.
I’ve built a risk methodology and register to make judgments easier to explain and challenge. A score should start a useful conversation about exposure and action, not end one.
I build practical tooling too: Python checks for exposed secrets and personal data, automation around evidence, and an internal GRC platform. I want people spending their time on judgment rather than copying facts between systems.
In incident and privacy work, I try to say what we know, what we don’t, and what we’re doing next. That sounds simple. It gets much harder once people are waiting for an answer.
I’m drawn to the way security is explained: to an engineer, a customer, an executive, or someone caught in an incident. The right detail changes, but honesty should not.
I’m interested in methods that expose the reasoning behind a score. If we can’t explain why it moved, it probably isn’t helping us decide.
New tools make old questions sharper: what data is involved, who has control, what can be checked, and who is accountable when the system surprises us?
I also host conversations about security on Link11’s English-language Follow the White Rabbit podcast. Talking through a question with someone else often gets me further than another slide deck.
The podcast ↗Outside work, I can turn a Ghana match into a very detailed conversation about midfield balance, pressing triggers, and who should start. I run, work on my German, and am slowly learning French.
I like learning the system underneath something—whether it’s a language, a football press, or a security program—and then finding a way to explain it simply.
Still asking the next question.